THE KROGER CO. | Consider Increasing the Scale, Pace, and Rigor of GHG Emissions Reductions at THE KROGER CO.

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
KR
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: Shareholders request that The Kroger Co. (Kroger) issue a report, above and beyond existing disclosures, describing whether and, if so, how it will increase the scale and pace of its GHG emissions reduction efforts. The report should be updated annually, prepared at reasonable expense, and omit proprietary information.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must decrease 43% by 2030 from 2019 levels and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5°C [1] and avoid the most damaging effects of climate change. Deloitte estimates that ?unchecked climate change could cost the global economy $178 trillion over the next 50 years.? [2] In its 10-K Kroger recognizes business risks from climate change, stating the effects ?present both physical risks?and transition risks?which are expected to be widespread and unpredictable.? Extreme weather events may affect Kroger?s ability, ?to procure needed commodities at costs and in quantities that are optimal.? Kroger also acknowledges local, state or federal regulatory responses to climate change may affect its financial condition. Kroger set a goal to reduce its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions 30% by 2030, applies climate risk modeling to its direct operations, and mentions having business resilience plans. However, the Company has not provided detailed information on its plans to address Scope 3 emissions (representing approximately 93% of Kroger?s carbon emissions), nor has it applied its risk modeling to its full value chains. Without disclosures detailing efforts to mitigate its largest climate impacts, or plans to boost the agricultural supply chain resiliency that is critical to its Our Brands products (26% of FY25 revenue), Kroger may face elevated supply chain, regulatory, operational, and reputational risk. Kroger disclosed a Scope 3 footprint for the first time in 2025 but has not outlined its intention or strategies to reduce these emissions, a standard practice among peers. Albertsons and Ahold Delhaize have set science-based value chain emissions reduction targets. Costco and Walmart provide greater detail regarding their supplier engagement strategies, emissions reduction progress, and efforts to reduce Scope 3 emissions. [3] Developing and reporting on plans and intentions to reduce Kroger?s value chain emissions can help Kroger appropriately manage climate risks and opportunities. This would differ from Kroger?s existing sustainability disclosures by providing shareholders with forward-looking and/or quantitative information, at management?s discretion, describing actions the company will take to reduce full value chain emissions.
Supporting statement
At management?s discretion, the report could cover topics including: Quantitative reduction pathway to meet existing scope 1 and 2 goals; If Kroger does not plan to increase the scale and pace of its GHG emissions reduction efforts, disclose why; Kroger?s supplier engagement emissions reduction efforts, suppliers? decarbonization progress, and related impacts on Kroger?s carbon footprint; and Details about Kroger?s plan to invest in and scale projects to reduce value chain emissions and increase supply chain resiliency. [1] https://www.ipcc.ch/2022/04/04/ipcc-ar6-wgiii-pressrelease/ [2] https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/about/press-room/deloitte-research-reveals-inaction-on-climate-change-could-cost-the-world-economy-us-dollar-178-trillion-by-2070.html [3] https://mobilecontent.costco.com/staging/resource/img/25w03130/5a_ClimateActionPlan_FY24.pdf ; Walmart 2025 ESG report

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.