Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Separate Chair & CEO at Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
TMOS34:BZ
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • CEO / chair duality
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED : Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt an enduring policy, and amend the governing documents as necessary including the Corporate Governance Guidelines in order that 2 separate people hold the office of the Chairman and the office of the CEO as soon as possible.
Supporting statement
The Chairman of the Board shall be an Independent Director. An independent Lead Director shall not be a substitute for an independent Board Chairman. The Board shall have the discretion to select an interim Chairman of the Board, who is not an Independent Director, to serve while the Board is required to seek an Independent Chairman of the Board on an accelerated basis. This policy could be phased in when there is a contract renewal for our current CEO or for the next CEO transition although it is better to adopt it now to obtain the maximum benefit. An independent Board Chairman at all times improves corporate governance by bringing impartiality, objective oversight, and external expertise to board decisions, mitigating conflicts of interest, enhancing transparency, and boosting shareholder confidence. This detached perspective allows the chairman to focus on shareholder interests , strengthen management accountability, and provide critical checks and balances, ultimately contributing to long-term sustainability and credibility. An independent Board Chairman could also help Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) deal with headwinds like those that emerged in 2025: TMO stock was at only $585 in late 2025 after trading at $672 in 2021 in spite of a robust stock market. TMO faced a significant revenue headwind in China due to weak market conditions, a challenging pricing and reimbursement environment, and the impact of ongoing tariffs. The company estimated a $400 million hit to sales in China for the year. The diagnostics and healthcare segments saw low single-digit declines in revenue growth, largely due to conditions in China. The analytical instruments segment also saw a decrease in adjusted operating income and operating margin. Revenue from the academic and government sectors declined due to persistent funding constraints and grant cancellations by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). TMO continued to reduce its headcount and consolidate facilities, incurring restructuring costs. These actions were primarily in the laboratory products and biopharma services segments. Headwinds from tariffs and related foreign exchange impacts presented ongoing challenges to the company's operations and profitability. A Reuters exclusive reported in October 2024 (news widely discussed into 2025) that a Thermo Fisher plant making an infant RSV drug had breached FDA rules, including issues with procedures to prevent microbial contamination. While the FDA stated concerns were addressed, the news highlighted TMO manufacturing practice issues. In January 2025, a journal retracted a Thermo Fisher study over ethical concerns that a tool used in the study violated standards of forensic genetics, as informed consent for DNA data collection in China could not be verified.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.