This proposal advocates a best practice given that UHS officers and directors have only 16% of the ownership of UHS yet have 91% of the voting power. Long-term UHS shareholders may have forgotten this detriment to UHS shareholder value. To improve shareholder value it would be a best practice for UHS to transition to a one-share equals one-vote structure, but until this is accomplished the annual meeting voting results should be presented in 2 formats. Thus the vast majority of UHS shareholders will then be able to see clearly when the votes of the UHS officers and directors are contrary to the votes of the overwhelming majority of UHS shareholders. Dual-class stocks like UHS tend to create an inferior class of shareholders and hand over power to a select few, who are then allowed to pass the financial risk onto others. With few constraints placed upon them, managers holding super-class stock can spin out of control. Insiders and senior managers can entrench themselves into the operations of the company, regardless of their abilities and performance. Dual-class structures may allow management to make bad decisions with few consequences. Until UHS transitions to one-share equals one-vote, it is a best practice for the UHS annual meeting voting results to be reported in 2 formats.