Walmart, Inc | Workforce Implications of Adoption of AI & Automation at Walmart, Inc

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
WMT
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Digital rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: Shareholders request Walmart Inc. (Walmart or the Company) prepare a report on the principles by which the Company seeks to address and measure the social implications on its workforce of the growing adoption of advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence and automation. The report, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential and proprietary information, should be made available to investors.
Whereas clause
The rapid deployment of artificial intelligence (?AI?) and automation across industries represents one of the most significant workforce transformations of the coming decade. As the largest private employer1 in the United States, Walmart's approach to adopting these technologies carries material implications for its associates, long-term shareholder value, and the broader retail sector. Walmart has publicly emphasized both the scale and ambition of its AI strategy. The Company?s Chief Technology Officer recently highlighted an estimated $815 billion AI investment, noting that AI is embedded across operations, from supply chains and logistics to store-level processes and customer-facing systems.2 Walmart has stated that its objective is to ?build the future of retail? by integrating agentic AI?systems capable of autonomous decision-making?across virtually all aspects of the business.3 Walmart has rolled out AI-enabled tools to support hiring4, scheduling5, training, and task prioritization, including an OpenAI associate training program6, while expanding automation in fulfillment centers and supply chain operations7. Most notably, in October 2025, Walmart implemented a new algorithmic, performance-based system to determine annual pay increases for hourly employees, replacing its traditional tenure-based approach.8 This shift represents a fundamental change in compensation for a substantial portion of the workforce and illustrates the growing role of algorithmic systems in employment outcomes. Walmart has also articulated a Responsible AI Pledge committing to principles such as fairness, transparency, privacy, security, and human oversight.9 These commitments indicate awareness of the ethical and social dimensions of advanced technologies. However, the pledge does not provide investors sufficient insight into how these commitments are operationalized, monitored, and enforced across a workforce of Walmart?s size and complexity. Studies10 indicate retail work contains a high proportion of tasks vulnerable to automation, raising risks related to job redesign, deskilling, wage inequality, and uneven access to training and advancement.11 Research12 also warns that algorithmic performance and pay systems can introduce bias, intensify work pace, result in unqualified hires, and reduce transparency if not carefully governed.13 These risks are amplified at Walmart?s scale, where even marginal impacts can affect hundreds of thousands of workers. For shareholders, the key question is how the Company is measuring and managing the workforce-related risks and opportunities associated with AI and automation. A report describing the principles guiding AI deployment, the metrics used to assess workforce impacts?such as job quality, compensation, training effectiveness, and equity?and the governance structures overseeing these systems would enable shareholders to evaluate whether Walmart?s AI strategy aligns with its public commitments, supports long-term value creation, and mitigates workforce-related risks.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.