CHEVRON CORPORATION | Transparency report on accounting practices at CHEVRON CORPORATION

Status
Omitted
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
CVX
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Other
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue a transparency report to shareholders, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, prepared in consideration of guidelines of Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (“GAAP”), SEC reporting guidelines, and Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements for the Company’s acquisition of the United States?based Noble Energy and PDC Energy and the accounting for those assets. Shareholders request that the Company cease and desist Enron?like deceptive accounting practices and re?instate safeguards to ensure Sarbanes?Oxley compliance.
Supporting statement
"The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that mandates certain practices in financial record keeping and reporting for corporations. The law was enacted as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals, including Enron and WorldCom. The law was created to help prevent those events from happening again. Chevron and other energy companies committed vast resources of time, money and manpower (“Human Energy”) to ensure Sarbanes Oxley compliance. Chevron successfully completed the acquisition of Noble Energy (“Noble”). However, after the completion of that acquisition, a Chevron employee, whose background is management, changed the accounting of the Colorado Noble assets to artificially enhance the quantity of liquids produced. This also pushed an initiative to do the same with the PDC Energy (“PDC”) acquisition, changing the accounting in the same artificial way to enhance liquids produced for the Colorado PDC assets in an attempt to make the acquisition look better than it was, thereby affecting reserve and operations economics. Enron like deceptive accounting practices, including claiming ownership for liquids which Chevron did not own, concealing operating expenses, inflating reserves, falsifying royalties. This also created a toxic work environment to prevent employees who wanted to continue to do the right thing (preventing harm from succeeding in his objective). The toxic work environment was made aware to management up to and including Chevron’s CEO, Mike Wirth. Those of us in the energy industry recall the harmful cloud and damage to employees and shareholders caused by Enron. Enron executives went to prison. Others will recall that Shell executives lost their jobs for misstating Reserves. The liability to Chevron could potentially be millions of dollars in penalties, fines and fees due to improper payment to royalty owners (including States, the Federal Government and private owners), plus loss of business from damage to reputation and loss of investor confidence. Chevron appears to no longer have the appropriate accounting controls in place to ensure compliance with Sarbanes Oxley, GAAP and SEC regulations. In the interest of protecting shareholders’ investment, the shareholder proposal is straightforward with four (4) actions for Chevron: Requested Actions 1. Provide full transparency of the accounting changes made to the Colorado based Noble Energy and PDC Energy assets. 2. Provide full transparency of the accounting differences between the Colorado based Noble Energy and PDC Energy assets and those in the Permian based Noble Energy and PDC Energy assets. 3. Cease and desist Enron like deceptive accounting practices. 4. Re instate adequate safeguards to ensure Sarbanes Oxley, GAAP, and SEC compliance."

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.