BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc | Report on Supply Chain Deforestation Impacts at BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc

Status
Omitted
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
BJ:US
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Land use inc. deforestation
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc., (“BJ’s” or “the Company”) conduct an assessment of risks of deforestation associated with its private-label brands within one year and provide a report summarizing the results. The report may, at management’s discretion, be updated annually and include an assessment of forest degradation within the supply chain; feasible, time-bound target setting; third-party monitoring and verification; and assessment of the financial and operational implications of the related risks.
Whereas clause
More than half of global GDP is moderately or highly dependent on nature. Ongoing deforestation threatens to disrupt the reliability of natural ecosystems and the global economy, creating potential material financial risks for companies and investors. The World Bank estimates that the degradation of natural systems, could reduce global GDP by $2.7 trillion annually by 2030. BJ’s use of commodities (e.g., beef, palm oil, soy and paper/pulp) associated with deforestation exposes its supply chain to the major drivers of global deforestation. Despite these risks, BJ’s does not publicly disclose its policies or practices for assessing and managing deforestation risk. Moreover, the Company’s removal of its sustainability reporting from its website further limits transparency into how these risks are addressed. The Company’s 10-K identifies “consistent product quality, competitive pricing, and availability of these products is essential to developing and maintaining member loyalty to its private label brands,” all of which depend on a stable and resilient supply chain. Deforestation threatens this resiliency, yet there is no clear indication that BJ’s evaluates or mitigates related risks specifically for its private-label offerings, for which the Company has direct control over product sourcing. This concern becomes increasingly consequential as BJ’s “expect[s] to increase the sales penetration of [its] private-label items,” which currently represent 26% of annual sales. Failure to assess these risks means growing private-label sales penetration could magnify deforestation risks, including supply chain disruptions, reputational damage, and material financial implications, all of which are key risks identified in the Company’s 10-K Peer retailers such as Costco and Kroger have disclosed deforestation risk assessment results across their supply chains, including private-label products. Furthermore, competing consumer goods companies that produce products similar to BJ’s private label brands such as Unilever, Kraft Heinz, and General Mills, have taken greater action on deforestation by implementing time-bound deforestation-free commitments across key commodities and enforcing rigorous traceability and supplier standards. BJ’s lack of comparable assessment and commitment to eliminate deforestation lags peers and limits the Company’s ability to manage supply chain risks, mitigate reputational and operational vulnerabilities, and safeguard long-term performance. A robust assessment of deforestation risks, including within BJ’s private-label offerings, Berkley Jensen and Wellsley Farms, would help ensure BJ’s private-label growth is supported by responsible sourcing, sound governance, and effective risk management. We urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.