THE HOME DEPOT, INC. | Report on Objective Evaluation of Recycling-Related Plastics Targets at THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
HD
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors commission and publish, by March 31, 2027, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, a report evaluating Home Depot’s recycling-related plastics targets. Ideally the report would present a science-based and economically rigorous analysis comparing these targets to retaining the use of virgin plastics where they remain the most practical, safe, and cost-effective solution.
Whereas clause
Whereas: The Home Depot Inc. (“Home Depot” or “Company”) has announced initiatives that prioritize recycled or “recyclable” materials for private-brand products and supplier-delivered goods. The Company states that by the end of 2028 it requires suppliers to reduce or convert 200 million pounds of plastic used in products and packaging to recycled or alternative materials. Unrealistic schemes like Home Depot’s are driven by an alleged “plastics pollution crisis.” Yet objective evidence shows that plastic packaging in many ways offers net environmental and economic benefits, including lighter weight, durability, lower transportation costs, and reduced emissions compared to alternatives. Critics contend that to the degree there’s a problem, that it's not plastic production, but inadequate waste management systems, particularly in developing economies. Advocates for a “circular economy” rely on biased reports such as Breaking the Plastic Wave and Plastics: The Costs to Society, the Environment, and the Economy, which emphasize environmental “costs” while mostly ignoring the benefits of plastics and the trade-offs of substitutes. Shareholders are entitled to understand whether forcing recycled or recyclable substitutes into the supply chain is justified when virgin plastics may remain the most practical and cost-effective option. The Company states that “compared to virgin plastics which are manufactured to be abundant and consistent, recycled plastics are more difficult to source, less physically consistent and often more expensive.” Home Depot has not presented a comprehensive analysis that weighs supply, performance, quality, safety, logistics, and cost trade-offs of these targets specifically against continuing the use of virgin plastics where appropriate. Materiality: Home Depot reported $159.5 billion in sales and $14.8 billion in net earnings for fiscal 2024. Given the scale of private-brand and vendor-delivered products and packaging governed by Home Depot’s standards, policies and targets can reasonably affect more than 5% of the Company’s economics. This policy is a corporate-level function rather than a “ordinary business” activity left to suppliers. Packaging material sourcing and product specifications are governed by Home Depot. Accordingly, shareholders have a legitimate interest in an objective evaluation of these targets versus the continued use of virgin plastics where warranted.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement: An objective evaluation might: 1. Comprehensively analyze the environmental impact of plastics versus alternatives, including lifecycle emissions, energy usage, and recyclability; 2. Assess the economic costs of replacing virgin plastics with recycled content inputs, and the implications for Home Depot’s profitability and therefore shareholders; 3. Examine whether corporate policy targets the true pollution culprit — poor waste management — rather than misrepresenting plastics’ positives and negatives.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.