Walmart, Inc | Request for Cumulative Voting for Board Elections

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
WMT
Lead filer
National Legal and Policy Center
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders recommend the Board of Directors take the steps necessary to adopt cumulative voting in the election of directors at Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”). This could include amending the certificate of incorporation, bylaws, and/or other governing documents as needed to state that, in any election of directors, each shareholder shall be entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares owned multiplied by the number of directors to be elected, and that shareholders may allocate such votes among one or more nominees at their discretion, as permitted by applicable law.
Supporting statement
Cumulative voting is a straightforward, widely understood mechanism that strengthens board accountability to all owners—especially long-term minority shareholders—without dictating outcomes or interfering with ordinary business operations.

This proposal is especially relevant at Walmart given that members of the Walton family collectively control roughly half of Walmart’s voting power.1 While this concentrated ownership has provided continuity, it also limits the ability of non-controlling shareholders to influence board composition under the current system.

Walmart has also been flagged by ISS for limited board refreshment, in part due to several long-tenured directors.2 ISS has repeatedly cautioned that extended tenure—commonly defined as more than nine years—may diminish perceived independence and reduce the influx of new skills and perspectives.3 Cumulative voting would provide minority shareholders with a constructive tool to encourage healthy board renewal without disrupting the company’s stability.

Walmart’s more than 50-year family-control dynamic further underscores the need for balanced representation.4 Cumulative voting would not impede the Walton family’s ability to elect preferred directors, but it would give other shareholders a meaningful opportunity to influence at least some board seats, strengthening accountability and aligning Walmart’s governance with widely accepted investor-protection principles.

Leading governance authorities support cumulative voting:

•ISS advises voting for shareholder proposals to provide or restore cumulative voting.5
•The International Finance Corporation identifies cumulative voting as an important mechanism for safeguarding minority shareholder rights.6
•The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Principles of Corporate Governance cite cumulative voting as a proven method for enhancing shareholder representation.7
Broader market trends reinforce the urgency of board-accountability reforms. The SEC’s universal-proxy rules have heightened focus on director elections. Lazard reports that board change remains the most common activist objective.8 Ernst & Young notes that shareholder support for governance proposals has risen significantly, with strong investor backing for board-related reforms, and many exceeding levels that typically prompt board action.9

Cumulative voting is a practical extension of these developments. It enhances representation, promotes board accountability, and moderates the effects of highly concentrated ownership while fully preserving Walmart’s operational continuity and existing governance framework.

1 https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/060416/top-4-walmart-shareholders-wmt.asp

2 https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/wal-mart-board-criticises-iss-20140527

3 https://www.issgovernance.com/board-refreshment-trends-sp-1500-firms/

4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walmart#Ownership

5 https://www.issgovernance.com/file/policy/active/americas/US-Voting-Guidelines.pdf

6 https://www.ifcbeyondthebalancesheet.org/about-the-toolkit/governance/minority-shareholders

7 https://www.oecd.org/corporate/principles-corporate-governance/

8 https://www.lazard.com/perspective/review-of-shareholder-activism-h1-2025

9 https://www.ey.com/en_us/board-matters/2025-proxy-season-review-four-key-takeaways

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.