NETFLIX, INC. | Report on Politicized Brand Misalignment at NETFLIX, INC.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
NFLX
Lead filer
Bowyer Research
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the Board of Directors of Netflix conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year, at reasonable cost and excluding proprietary information and disclosure of anything that would constitute an admission of pending litigation, evaluating how Netflix’s branding and marketing, and public policy positions may expose the company to significant legal, regulatory, and reputational risk, and how such exposure may impact shareholder value.
Whereas clause
Netflix is a globally recognized brand and a publicly traded corporation with fiduciary duties to its shareholders. In recent years, however, Netflix has adopted branding and marketing strategies that promote sexual content to young audiences and have done tremendous damage to company value.

Netflix has faced significant backlash over its use of gender ideology in children’s programming. Shows such as Dead End: Paranormal Park and films such as Cuties have been widely criticized for promoting highly controversial narratives regarding gender ideology & sexual activity to young audiences. The most recent example, Dead End: Paranormal Park, features1 a transgender teen protagonist and was rated TV-Y7, indicating suitability for children aged seven and older. Tesla CEO Elon Musk publicly canceled his Netflix subscription over the show and urged others to do the same, leading to a reported drop2 in Netflix’s stock price. Another example, Strawberry Shortcake: Berry in the Big City, promoted3 transgender characters and was rated TV-Y, indicating suitability for children of all ages, and The Baby-Sitters Club reportedly4 “featured a child character shaming doctors for referring to a child patient by biological pronouns.” Another example was 2018’s Baby, which “portrayed a group of teenagers entering into prostitution as a glamorized ‘coming-of-age’ story” as per NCOSE analysis.5

This promotion of sexualized content, particularly to Netflix’ youngest viewers, has alienated customers, employees, and shareholders, and exposed Netflix to litigation and regulatory scrutiny. One earlier example of programming, the 2020 film Cuties, sparked so much controversy over depicting the sexualization of children that a grand jury indicted the company over child exploitation charges.6 Crucially, this has exposed Netflix to significant contingent liability and material legal risk, incurred costs of litigation, regulatory enforcement, and compliance, and materially affected other segments of the business.

At the same time as these widespread public controversies, Netflix has notably underperformed its peer group competitors over the past 5 years (as per Bowyer Research analysis). When Netflix’s $500 billion market value7 is negatively impacted by public controversies related to sexualized children’s content that hurt8 stock prices, shareholders are right to ask the company to take a serious look at how its brand performance has been hurt by such consistent controversies.

It is imperative that Netflix reassess its approach to public engagement. By commissioning a report that transparently evaluates these risks, the Board will demonstrate its commitment to fiduciary duty and corporate accountability. Shareholders deserve clarity on how Netflix’s ideological positioning may be undermining enterprise value—and how the company intends to mitigate these risks moving forward.

1 https://www.msn.com/en-in/entertainment/tv/elon-musks-cancel-netflix-campaign-from-charlie-kirk-s-death-to-lgbtq-shows-why-has-hamish-steele-triggered-controversy/
2 https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/10/02/netflix-stock-drops-again-now-down-24-since-musks-call-for-cancellations/
3 https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1973918621375275358
4 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/oct/8/elon-musk-calls-netflix-boycott-transgender-content-childrens/
5 https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/netflix-baby-trivializes-teenage-sexual-exploitation/
6 https://www.ktre.com/2022/06/06/judge-dismisses-tyler-county-lawsuit-against-netflix-over-cuties-film/
7 https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NFLX/
8 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/netflix-stock-logs-biggest-weekly-drop-since-april-as-elon-musk-calls-for-users-to-cancel-subscriptions-200715651.html

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU.Against

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.