Block, inc. | Establishing a Technology Committee

Status
Filed
AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
SQ
Resolution ask
Amend board structure
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Digital rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
Resolved clause
Shareholders recommend that the Board of Directors of Block, Inc. ("Block" or "Company") establish a formal board level Technology Committee. The Technology Committee's responsibilities may include, at the Board's discretion, key technological areas such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, data privacy and security, and other existing and/or emerging technology issues.
Supporting statement
Robust oversight benefits from board-level committee structures that effectively divide responsibilities into focused areas, especially around complex or high-risk issues. As long-time shareholders, we believe that the current structure of Block's Board of Directors is deficient. Block's Audit and Risk Committee (Audit Committee) is overburdened. In addition to data privacy and cybersecurity, the Audit Committee's charter includes oversight of the independent auditor; legal and regulatory compliance; internal controls and audit; financial statements; risk management; related party transactions; and oversight of Square Financial Services, the Company's industrial loan subsidiary. The three current Audit Committee directors all serve on other board-level committees and have significant outside obligations. For example, one director serves as board chair of an international bank, a global media conglomerate, and the UK'S largest airport. Another was until recently the managing partner of a large venture capital firm, where he still serves as parter [sic], in addition to serving on the boards of three other public companies. Block does not disclose a skills matrix that would allow investors to ascertain whether the Audit Committee's directors have the requisite knowledge to effectively oversee technology risk and adoption in addition to their already wide-ranging remit and outside obligations. Four of the Company's 10 board members do not serve on any committees. On January 15, 2025, Block paid $80 million to settle a coordinated financial enforcement action by 48 state regulators for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws. A consent order related to the same matters with New York State Department of Financial Services resulted in an additional $40 million penalty and cited cybersecurity deficiencies noting that "the Company's cybersecurity program [was] not subject to annual board review and approval" as required by state law. The next day, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a separate $175 million settlement with Block for weak security protocols that "allowed fraud to proliferate." The creation of a Technology Committee would help Block's board mitigate risks, better utilize its time and resources, make more informed decisions, strengthen accountability, and seize opportunities related to new technology adoption.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.