Dollarama, Inc. | IN-PERSON ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS at Dollarama, Inc.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
3
Resolution details
Company ticker
DOL
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
“It is proposed that the annual meetings of the corporation be held in person, with virtual meetings being able to serve as a supplement, without replacing in-person meetings.”
Supporting statement
“Given that in-person annual meetings are the only time during the year when shareholders can meet and exchange with the members of the board of directors and senior management on the issues of the company, it is of primary importance that this dialogue be preserved and be the subject of encouragement, given the benefits it provides. We will allow ourselves to enumerate a few of them. 1. Governance is stronger when executives are present and dialogue with their shareholders According to a study4 by Miriam Schwartz-Ziv (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), 100% virtual meetings: • reduce the duration of exchanges, • include fewer questions from shareholders, • offer less response time by executives. In person, relational dynamics—looks, tone, physical presence—create a stronger environment of accountability and limit the perception of filtering or excessive control. 2. The hybrid format stimulates shareholder engagement Broadridge5 studies show that virtual platforms increase participation but the content of online exchanges often remains superficial. The hybrid format allows all types of shareholders to participate fully: • institutional investors can intervene in a structured manner in the room, • retail shareholders can vote and ask questions remotely. • It is an inclusive and balanced model. 3. Avoiding criticism regarding transparency An exclusively virtual format can raise suspicions of opacity: filtering of questions, pre-written responses, absence of real debate. Maintaining a physical meeting strengthens confidence in the democratic process and protects the company’s reputation. 4. Not a question of cost, but of governance Maintaining an in-person format does not require large public events. A modest venue with video capture is sufficient, and webcasting tools are already in place. The benefits in terms of governance and perception largely outweigh the modest logistical costs. This proposal received the support of more than 56% of the votes at the last annual meeting.” 4How Shifting from In-Person to Virtual Shareholder Meetings Affects Shareholders’ Voice, Miriam Schwartz-Ziv, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 2020-08-18 https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/08/18/how-shifting-from-in-person-to-virtual shareholder-meetings-affects-shareholdersvoice/ 5 In Baseball And Corporate Proxy, Change Can Be A Home Run, Chris Perry talks about the upcoming 2024 proxy season. Chris Perry, président de Broadridge financial Solutions, Forbes, 2024-03-14 https://www.broadridge.com/article/bbd/in-baseball-and corporate-proxy-change-can-be-a-home-run 2024 Canadian Proxy Statistics https://www.broadridge.com/_assets/pdf/broadridge-2024-canadianproxy-statistics.pdf

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.