NVIDIA CORPORATION | Report on workforce civil liberties at NVIDIA CORPORATION

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
NVDA
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the Board of Directors conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year, at reasonable cost and excluding proprietary and confidential information, evaluating how NVIDIA’s hiring and training policies and practices impact employees and prospective employees based on their race, color, religion (including religious views), sex, national origin, or political views, and the associated legal, reputational, operational, and other relevant risks to the NVIDIA.
Supporting statement
NVIDIA Corporation has over 36,000 employees. As an employer, it is legally required to comply with many laws prohibiting discrimination against employees on a variety of factors, including race, sex, religion, and sometimes political affiliation. But the 2025 edition of the Viewpoint Diversity Score Business Index found that 90% of scored companies, as well as NVIDIA, promote divisive training and recruitment concepts like critical race theory (CRT) that replace genuine cultural and ideological diversity with a narrow focus on group identity. NVIDIA has stated that it has “increased [its] focus on diversity recruiting” and “when recruiting new talent. . . [it] strive[s] to build a robust talent pipeline that includes those underrepresented in the technology field, including women, black/African American, and Hispanic/Latino candidates.” Focusing on these metrics in recruiting is rooted in concepts that label employees as “oppressed” or “oppressors” based on belief or immutable traits, which can foster hostility and partiality instead of equal opportunity based on merit. A recent study found that DEI actually increases bias, hostility, and attribution of discriminatory intent instead of reducing them. DEI also silences dissenting views: the Freedom at Work survey found that 60% of employees feared reprisal for expressing their religious or political views at work, and over half feared the same for private social media posts. Companies are also facing increased legal and reputational risk for DEI programs that make distinctions based on race or other protected classes in light of recent Supreme Court decisions in Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard, Groff v DeJoy, City of St. Louis v. Muldrow, and Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services. State attorneys general and employees have initiated lawsuits and investigations. Recent scholarship has cast serious doubt on the common assertion that DEI is good for business. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that “Diversity Goals Are Disappearing from Companies’ Annual Reports.” And numerous companies are voluntarily removing DEI initiatives entirely in response to sustained customer dissatisfaction and public pressure. On top of this, President Trump issued an executive order seeking to root out illegal DEI practices, including in the private sector. The EEOC has initiated investigations and secured settlements from major law firms to stop their DEI practices. The EEOC and DOJ jointly issued guidance detailing DEI practices that may be illegal and encouraging whistleblowers to report these practices. In light of these risks, the Company must take immediate steps to assess potential shortcomings and allay these concerns. 1. https://storage.googleapis.com/vds_storage/document/2025 Business-Index.pdf 2. https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/Solutions/documents/NVIDIA-Sustainability-Report-Fiscal-Year 2025.pdf#:~:text=When%20recruiting%20new%20talent%20or,and%20partnering%20with%20our%20community 3. https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-bombshell-study-shows-dei-programs-increase-hostility 4. https://www.viewpointdiversityscore.org/polling 5. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/diversity-equity-dei-companies-blum-2040b173 6. https://econjwatch.org/articles/mckinsey-s-diversity-matters-delivers-wins-results-revisited 7. https://www.wsj.com/business/diversity-goals-are-disappearing-from-companies-annual-reports-459d1ef3 8. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13812241/american-brand-dei-rules-backlash.html 9. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity/ 10. https://www.hrdive.com/news/four-big-law-firms-curb-dei-eeoc-settlements/745314/ 11. https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/04/doj-and-eeoc-issue-guidance-regarding-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.