THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY | Strengthen Board Oversight of Workplace Equity Issues at The Walt Disney Company

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
DIS
Resolution ask
Strengthen board oversight of issue
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED, that shareholders of The Walt Disney Company ("Disney") ask the board of directors to strengthen board oversight of workforce equity issues by assigning responsibility for oversight to an existing or new board committee. For purposes of this proposal, "workforce equity issues" include racial and gender pay equity, employment discrimination, diversity and inclusion and the relationship between compensation and benefits provided to senior executives and those provided to the rest of the workforce.
Supporting statement
The COVID-19 pandemic and movement for racial justice have intensified the already widespread public debate about workplace equity concerns. Women and nonwhite workers have lost jobs at higher rates than white workers since the pandemic began. Black and Latino workers are overrepresented among essential workers, exposing them to greater risk. Workers have engaged in sick-outs to demand increased hazard pay, paid sick leave and unsafe working conditions.

The unavailability of paid sick days for workers during the pandemic has been a subject of substantial attention from the media and policy makers.1 The Families First Coronavirus Response Act provided up to two weeks of paid sick leave to employees sick with COVID-19 or quarantined due to exposure, and expanded family and medical leave. Some states and cities have adopted or updated paid sick leave laws (in some cases limited to COVID-19 and/or certain groups of employees) since the pandemic began.

Disney has faced a great deal of controversy over workforce equity issues. Its decision to furlough about 50% of its workforce in April 2020, while some top executives agreed only to forego or cut their salaries, sacrificing less than 10% of their total pay, drew criticism.2 A group of female employees has filed an equal pay lawsuit.3 Supporting a California bill that proposed tying corporate taxes to the size of the CEO to worker pay gap, Disney heir Abigail Disney noted that Disney workers are paid so poorly that they "rely on food banks, sleep in cars or live so close to the bone that even a small problem could send them into a death spiral."4

None of Disney's board committees currently has responsibility for workforce equity issues. We believe that more robust board-level oversight of such issues would boost Disney's performance in these areas and improve management of the financial and reputational risks they can create. Our proposal draws on a recent article by former Delaware Chief Justice Leo Strine Jr. advocating that the board's compensation committee "expand its perspective and become a committee focused on the company's workforce as a whole" to address "the increased demand that boards give more focus to how the company treats its workforce."5 Although we do not specifically ask that the compensation committee be tasked with overseeing workforce equity issues, we believe those matters could dovetail with the committee's existing executive pay-related mandates.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.