PEPSICO, INC. | Disclosure of Pesticide Use in Agricultural Supply Chains at Pepsico, Inc.

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
PEP
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Public health
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Pepsico issue a report at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information explaining if and how the company is measuring the use in its agricultural supply chains of pesticides that cause harm to human health and the environment.
Whereas clause
The use of pesticides in food production is leading to significant harm. One third of every bite of food we eat is dependent on pollinators; but pollinator species are declining at alarming rates in significant part due to the use of toxic pesticides on farms. Pesticides also cause a number of serious health effects in humans from cancers to developmental defects in infants and children. Health advocates have alarmed consumers about the use of glyphosate in Pepsico's Quaker products, and consumer lawsuits have targeted manufacturers of foods containing pesticide residues.

Increasing use of pesticides also causes suppliers to be less resilient and less productive due to proliferation of pesticide-resistant weeds and insects, loss of biodiversity, loss of topsoil, and soil degradation.

Pepsico does not currently gather or disclose quantitative information to assess the types and quantities of pesticides used by its suppliers. Pepsico asks suppliers to use integrated pest management (IPM), but does not define intended goals or practices, measuring only the number of growers reportedly using IPM practices. Crucially, Pepsico does not track whether a supplier using IPM is reducing the use, intensity, or toxicity of pesticides.

Pepsico has fallen behind competitors that are increasingly monitoring, disclosing, and reducing pesticide use and risk in supply chains.

General Mills discloses metrics for tracking and reporting pesticide use of suppliers engaged in its regenerative agriculture initiative, including type and name of input, amount and method used, cost and date of application, and pest or disease being controlled. It also reports pounds of pesticides avoided.

Sysco reports pesticide use avoided by suppliers using IPM annually, e.g. 6.3 million pounds of pesticides avoided in 2018.

Kellogg's is improving pesticide use data collection through an annual Grower Survey, including recording use of glyphosate in wheat and oats crops, and committing to phase out pre-harvest desiccation with glyphosate for those crops by 2025.

Campbell's has committed to pilot a pesticide data collection and reporting tool in tomatoes and to begin collecting pesticide use data in potatoes for future reporting.

In a competitive marketplace that is increasingly demanding clean food and reduced stakeholder and environmental harm, understanding and tracking supplier use of pesticides in the supply chain reduces risk for shareholders and our company, while reducing harm to an array of stakeholders.
Supporting statement
While specific metrics are left to management discretion, shareholders recommend that the company measure and disclose the following information: Type and amount of pesticides avoided annually through targeted strategies, e.g. regenerative programs, Integrated Pest Management (IPM), or other methods; Priority pesticides for reduction or elimination; Company targets and timelines, if any, for pesticide reduction.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.