PHILLIPS 66 | Report on corporate climate lobbying in line with Paris Agreement at Phillips 66

Status
62.49% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
PSX
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) describing if, and how, Phillips 66's lobbying activities (direct and through trade associations) align with the goal of limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius (the Paris Climate Agreement's goal). The report should also address the risks presented by any misaligned lobbying and the company's plans, if any, to mitigate these risks.
Supporting statement
According to the November 2019 "Emissions Gap Report" issued by the United Nations Environment Programme, critical gaps remain between the commitments national governments have made and the actions required to prevent the worst effects of climate change. Companies have an important and constructive role to play in enabling policy- makers to close these gaps.

Corporate lobbying activities that are inconsistent with meeting the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement, however, present regulatory, reputational, legal and financial risks to investors. These efforts also exacerbate systemic risks to our economies, as delays in implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement increase the physical risks of climate change - as we have seen in abundance in 2020 with wildfires and severe storms - and introduce uncertainty and volatility into our portfolios. We believe that Paris Climate Agreement-aligned climate lobbying helps to mitigate these risks, and contributes positively to the long-term value of our investment portfolios.

Of particular concern are the trade associations and other politically active organizations that speak for business but, unfortunately, too often present forceful obstacles to progress in addressing the climate crisis.

As investors, we view fulfillment of the Paris Climate Agreement's agreed goal-to hold the increase in the global average temperature to "well below" 2 degrees C above preindustrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C-as an imperative. We are convinced that unabated climate change will have a devastating impact on our clients, plan beneficiaries, and the value of their portfolios. We see future "business as usual" scenarios of a 3-4 degrees C or greater increase in the global average temperature as both unacceptable and uninvestable.

In 2019, two hundred institutional investors managing $6.5 trillion wrote to Phillips 66, seeking information on how the company is managing this critical governance issue. Insufficient information is presently available to help investors understand whether Phillips 66 works to ensure that its lobbying activities, directly, in the company's name, and indirectly, through trade associations, align with the Paris Climate Agreement's goals, and whether Phillips 66 takes any action to address any misalignments it has found. We believe Philips 66's reply was not responsive to this request.

Thus, we urge the Board and management to assess the company's climate related lobbying and report to shareholders.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
GreeneyeFor
Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLCFor
CoreCommodity Management, LLCFor
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USSForWe are supportive of the proposal to ensure alignment between the Company's public policy positions and the lobbying activities of related industry bodies.
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.Against

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.