NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION | Report on corporate climate lobbying in line with Paris Agreement at NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

Status
76.44% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
NSC
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) describing if, and how, Norfolk Southern's lobbying activities (direct and through trade associations and other organizations) align with the goal of limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius (the Paris Climate Agreement's goal) and how the company plans to mitigate risks presented by any misalignment.
Supporting statement
According to the most recent annual "Emissions Gap Report" issued by the United Nations Environment Programme (November 26, 2019), critical gaps remain between the commitments national governments have made and the actions required to prevent the worst effects of climate change. Companies have an important and constructive role to play in enabling policymakers to close these gaps.

Corporate lobbying activities that are inconsistent with meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement present regulatory, reputational and legal risks to investors. These efforts present systemic risks to our economies, as delays in implementation of the Paris Agreement increase the physical risks of climate change, threaten economic stability, and introduce uncertainty and volatility into our portfolios. We believe that Paris-aligned climate lobbying helps to mitigate these risks and contributes positively to the long-term value of our investment portfolios.

Of particular concern are trade associations and other politically active organizations that speak for business but too often present unnecessary obstacles to progress in addressing the climate crisis.

As investors, we view fulfillment of the Paris Agreement's agreed goal-to hold the increase in the global average temperature to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius-as an imperative. We believe unabated climate change will have a devastating impact on the value of our portfolio. We see future "business as usual" scenarios of 3-4 degrees Celsius or greater as both unsustainable and unacceptable.

While we commend Norfolk Southern for setting short-term greenhouse gas emission goals and for considering a science-based reduction target,[1] transporting coal represents one of its primary lines of business: in 2019 shipping coal represented 12 percent of its shipping volume and 15 percent of its revenue.[2] According to press reports[3], Norfolk Southern has supported its coal customers by funding lobbying organizations, such as the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, which work to discredit climate science and oppose most federal climate policies.

We believe it is in the interest of shareholders that Norfolk Southern's management and Board of Directors ensure that its lobbying activities, both directly and indirectly through its trade and other associations, align with the Paris Agreement's goals and the company's own climate risk mitigation actions (e.g. emissions targets). Misalignment squanders company resources and presents reputational and other risks.

Thus, we urge the Board and management to assess Norfolk Southern's climate-related lobbying and report to shareholders.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Dana Investment Advisors (Delisted)For
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USSForWe are supportive of the proposal to ensure alignment between the Company's public policy positions and the lobbying activities of related industry bodies.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.