UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION | Greater Disclosure of Material Corporate Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Data at UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION

Status
81.38% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
UNP
Lead filer
As You Sow
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Union Pacific Corporation Union Pacific publish annually a report at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information assessing the Companys diversity and inclusion efforts. At a minimum the report should include: the process that the Board follows for assessing the effectiveness of its diversity equity and inclusion programs; the Board's assessment of program effectiveness as reflected in any goals, metrics and trends related to its promotion, recruitment and retention of protected classes of employees.
Whereas clause
Numerous studies have pointed to the corporate benefits of a diverse workforce. These include:
- Companies with the strongest racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their industry medians.
- Companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 21 percent more likely to outperform on profitability and 27 percent more likely to have superior value creation.
- A 2019 study of the S&P 500 by the Wall Street Journal found that the 20 most diverse companies had an average annual five year stock return that was 5.8 percent higher than the 20 least-diverse companies.

Despite such benefits, significant barriers exist for diverse employees advancing within their careers. Women enter the workforce in almost equal numbers as men (48 percent). However, women comprise only 22 percent of the executive suite. Similarly, people of color comprise 33 percent of entry level positions, but only 13 percent of the c-suite.

On its website, Union Pacific states, "Union Pacific's commitment to diversity and inclusion is based on our desire to create an environment where people can be their best, personally and professionally. From an employee's perspective, a diverse culture increases engagement, improves morale and supports safety. From a business perspective, diversity improves the company's decision making, problem solving, and strategic thinking, which translates into a competitive advantage with bottom-line results."

Despite this statement, Union Pacific has not released meaningful information that allows investors to determine the effectiveness of its human capital management programs related to workplace diversity. Stakeholders may become concerned that Union Pacific's statements are corporate puffery, language described by the United States Federal Trade Commission as marketing exaggerations intended to "puff up" companies or products and not able to be relied upon by consumers and investors.

Investor desire for information on this issue is significant. As of October, 2020, USD1.9 trillion in represented assets released an Investor Statement on the importance of increased corporate transparency on workplace equity data. It stated: It is essential that investors have access to the most up-to-date and accurate information related to diverse workplace policies, practices, and outcomes.
Supporting statement
Investors seek quantitative, comparable data to understand the effectiveness of the company's diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Dana Investment Advisors (Delisted)For
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.For
Boston Trust WaldenFor
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USSForUSS would support additional information on the Company's diversity policies and practices.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.