GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY | Paris-Aligned Climate Lobbying at GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Status
Omitted
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
GM
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the General Motors Company ("GM") Board of Directors conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) describing if, and how GM's lobbying activities (direct and through trade associations) and spending align with the Paris Climate Agreement's goal of limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius () and how GM plans to mitigate risks presented by any misalignment.
Supporting statement
According to the most recent annual "Emissions Gap Report" by the United Nations Environment Programme (November 26, 2019), critical gaps remain between the commitments by national governments and the actions required to prevent the worst effects of climate change. Negative corporate lobbying exacerbates this gap.

Corporate lobbying that is inconsistent with meeting the Paris Agreement goals presents regulatory, reputational and legal risks. It also presents systemic risks to our economies, as delays in implementation of the Paris Agreement increase the physical risks of climate change, pose a systemic risk to economic stability and introduce uncertainty and volatility into investors' portfolios. We believe that Paris-aligned climate lobbying helps to mitigate these risks and contributes positively to the long-term value of our portfolios.

Of particular concern are the trade associations that often present forceful obstacles to progress in addressing the climate crisis;they also provide anonymity for member companies to advance controversial lobbying positions.

As investors, we view achieving the Paris Agreement's goal-to hold the increase in the global average temperature to "well below" 2 degrees C, and to pursue efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees C-as an imperative. We are convinced unabated climate change will have a devastating impact on the value of our portfolio. We see future "business as usual" scenarios of 3-4 degrees C or greater as unacceptable and uninvestable.

Investors have consistently expressed concerns to GM about the climate implications of its lobbying to weaken vehicle emissions standards. GM discloses insufficient information to help investors understand whether it works to ensure that its lobbying activities, directly, in the company's name, and indirectly, through trade associations, align with the Paris Agreement's goals, and whether it takes any action to address any misalignments it has identified.

For the last four years, GM and its trade association lobbied to eviscerate federal vehicle emissions standards;it publicly supported significantly weakening the standards, and intervened in litigation in support of the Trump Administration's rollback. While it withdrew from the litigation in November 2020, its future positioning regarding the standards is unclear even as President-elect Biden has called for more stringent fuel economy standards.

According to The 2Degrees Investing Initiative, GM's production plans are aligned with a scenario well above 2 degrees C. Given its lobbying history, its high emission fleet, and its lack of concrete, time bound commitments to produce a significant number of electric vehicles in the U.S., investors have legitimate concerns about its lobbying.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.