GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY | Report on GHG Emissions Targets as a Performance Element of Executive Compensation at GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Status
15.70% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
GM
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the Board of Directors issue a report, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, evaluating and disclosing if and how the company has met the criteria of the Executive Renumeration Indicator, or whether it intends to revise its policies to be fully responsive to such Indicator.
Whereas clause
The increasing rate and number of climate-related disasters affecting society is causing alarms to be raised within the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, making the corporate sector's contribution to climate mitigation a significant policy issue;

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Climate Related Risk Subcommittee recently issued a report finding that climate change poses a significant risk to, and could impair the productive capacity of, the U.S. economy;

Shareholders are increasingly concerned about material climate risk to both their companies and their portfolios and seek clear and consistent disclosures from the companies in which they invest;

In response to material climate risk, the steering committee of the Climate Action 100+ initiative (CA100+), a coalition of more than 500 investors with over USD47 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Company Benchmark (Benchmark) calling on the largest carbon emitting companies - including our Company - to work toward reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to net zero, improving climate governance, and providing specific climate related financial disclosures;

An important indicator of company alignment with the Paris Agreement's 1.5 degree goal is Sub-indicator 8.2, which seeks disclosure on whether the company's executive remuneration scheme incorporates climate change performance elements ("Executive Remuneration Indicator");

Indicator 8.2 criteria include: (1)The company's CEO and/or at least one other senior executive's remuneration arrangements specifically incorporate climate change performance as a KPI determining performance-linked compensation (reference to 'ESG' or 'sustainability performance' are insufficient) and (2) that the company's CEO and/or at least one other senior executive's remuneration arrangements incorporate progress towards achieving the company's GHG reduction targets as a KPI determining performance-linked compensation (requires meeting relevant long, medium, and short term targets for Scope 1 - 3 emissions, consistent with net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner).

While GM has set GHG reduction targets, it has not reported a remuneration structure that links compensation awards with progress in achieving such targets - a governance best practice for reducing climate risk. Since executive compensation is an effective way to incentivize achievement of performance targets, disclosing relevant metrics can assure investors that management is setting and effectively implementing policies aligned with achieving the Paris 1.5 degree goal. GM's current trajectory is well above 2 degrees, and it has continued to increase the size of its large SUVs and trucks.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest, at Company discretion, the report also include any rationale for a decision not to set and disclose metrics in line with the Executive Renumeration Indicator.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USSForWe are supportive of the inclusion of sustainability related performance conditions in executive remuneration.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.