AMAZON.COM, INC. | Lobbying Disclosure at AMAZON.COM, INC.

Status
34.89% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
13
Resolution details
Company ticker
AMZN
Lead filer
Newground Social Investment, SPC
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the preparation of an annual report to disclose Amazon’s:
1.
Policies and procedures that govern lobbying (both direct and indirect) and grassroots lobbying communications.
​
2.
Payments used for: (A) direct or indirect lobbying, and (B) grassroots lobbying communications  –  in each case including the amount of payment and recipient.
​
3.
Board and management decision-making processes, and manner of oversight for making the payments described above.
​
For these purposes, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is one directed to the general public that:
•
Refers to specific legislation or regulation,
​
•
Reflects a view on legislation or regulation,
​
•
Encourages the recipient to take action regarding legislation or regulation.
​
“Indirect lobbying” is lobbying conducted by trade associations or other organizations to which Amazon belongs. Reporting on both types of lobbying should disclose efforts at the local, state, and federal levels.
This report shall be presented to the Audit Committee and posted on Amazon’s website.
Whereas clause
Full disclosure of Amazon.com’s lobbying activities and expenditures is needed to assess whether such lobbying fully serves shareholder best interest, and is consistent with Amazon’s stated policy goals.
Supporting statement
Amazon spent $65.0 million on federal lobbying for the four years 2015-2019. This does not include state lobbying (where Amazon also lobbies) where disclosure is uneven or entirely absent. For example, Amazon spent $1.7 million lobbying in California in that same period. And Amazon’s 2020 lobbying set a “new lobbying record as tech antitrust
scrutiny grows.”1 Amazon also lobbies overseas, in 2019 spending €1.8-2.0 million on European lobbying efforts alone.
Amazon belongs to the Business Roundtable (“BRT”) and the Chamber of Commerce (“CoC”), which have together spent over $2.0 billion on lobbying since 1998; and the company supports the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a controversial climate-denial organization.2 Amazon does not disclose individual payments to trade associations, so-called social welfare organizations, or what portion is used for lobbying  –  whether grassroots or indirect. Under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, grassroots lobbying is not reported at the federal level, and disclosure is spotty or entirely absent by state.
Amazon’s lack of disclosure creates serious reputational risk when its spending contradicts publicly-held company positions. For example: (A) CEO Jeff Bezos signed the BRT’s Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation  –  committing to invest in employees  –  yet Amazon hired lobbyists on COVID-19 issues to counter workers who protested lack of protections3; (B) Amazon publicly supported COVID-19 efforts, but its CoC dues went to directly lobby against use of the Defense Production Act for production of personal protective equipment for workers4; (C) Amazon cofounded the Climate Pledge, yet has only one lobbyist working on climate issues, while the CoC undermined the Paris climate accord.5 Groups are calling on CoC members, like Amazon, to change the CoC’s position on climate.6
Reputational damage from misalignments like these can significantly harm long-term shareholder value.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Dana Investment Advisors (Delisted)For
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USSForUSS believes the clear disclosure of political and lobbying expenditure is in the best interests of shareholders.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.