Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.) | Transition to a Public Benefit Corporation at Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)

Status
1.17% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
11
Resolution details
Company ticker
GOOGL
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Corporate purpose
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request our Board of Directors take steps necessary to amend our certificate of incorporation and, if necessary, bylaws (including presenting such amendments to the shareholders for approval) to become a public benefit corporation (a “PBC”), contingent on Class B stockholders converting sufficient Class B shares to Class A or Class C to ensure that at least 60% of the Company’s voting power is not beneficially owned or controlled by the holders of Class B Shares.
Supporting statement
Estimates state the Company has more than 4 billion users.1 It has eight applications with more than one billion users.2 This reach creates unique power, and power demands accountability. But our governance is structured to produce profits without accountability.



As a conventional corporation, the duties of Company directors emphasize shareholders, not stakeholders (except to the extent they create value for shareholders). In contrast, PBC directors must “balance” interests of shareholders, stakeholders, and specified benefits,3 allowing the corporation to protect communities, even when it reduces financial return to shareholders in the long run.



This distinction is critical. The Company’s capacity to link people around the globe provides potential to contribute to religious persecution,4 put democracy at risk,5 and undermine vaccination.6 Threats to freedom, democratice principles, and public health could be prioritized at a PBC, even if it sacrifices return.



These threats matter to the vast majority of our diversified shareholders: as of September 2020, the top five holders of the Company’s shares were mutual fund companies with indexed or otherwise broadly diversified portfolios. Diversified shareholders lose when companies harm the economy, because the value of diversified portfolios rises and falls with GDP.7 While the Company may profit by ignoring costs it inflicts on society, its diversified shareholders ultimately internalize those costs. (They may also be personally at risk from them).



Shareholders deserve an opportunity to vote on an amendment that will align our governance with shareholder interests and the global community in order to create meaningful accountability.



However, our multiclass structure, which vests control in individuals with wealth concentrated in our stock, could limit the efficacy of PBC status, because their concentrated ownership means they benefit when the company sacrifices social good for its own profit. Thus, the board resolution should provide that the amendment will only be effected if these individuals convert a number of high votes to low or no votes shares sufficient to provide meaningful accountability to diversified shareholders.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Anima Sgr Against
VidaCaixa Against
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USS Against After careful consideration, we do not believe the proponent's resolution is in the best interests of shareholders.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.