WAL-MART STORES, INC. | Create a Pandemic Workforce Advisory Council at WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Status
11.53% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
WMT
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders of Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”) ask the Board of Directors to create a “Pandemic Workforce Advisory Council” (the “Council”), composed of hourly Associates, to provide advice to the Board (including any relevant Board committee) upon request on pandemic-related workforce issues, including health and safety measures, whistleblower protection, and paid sick leave. Walmart would have discretion to disband the Council when no pandemic has been declared.
Supporting statement
I am a 20-year Walmart Associate, and I believe Walmart’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has failed employees and communities in which Walmart operates and created risks for shareholders. As essential workers, we put ourselves and our families at risk to provide customers with necessities. Although Walmart does not publicly report COVID-19 cases or deaths and managers have reportedly been coached to avoid disclosing infections, numerous outbreaks have been linked to Walmart stores including one in Massachusetts where 81 associates tested positive. According to reports from associates and the press, we know that thousands of associates have contracted COVID-19 and at least 22 have died, although that number is likely much higher. We depend on Walmart to protect us, but Walmart delayed adopting measures recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, such as reducing crowding in stores, cleaning more intensively, and providing protective gear to Associates. Implementation and enforcement in stores has been uneven at best.

Walmart’s emergency COVID-19 paid sick leave policy has also fallen short. A May 2020 survey of Walmart Associates found that 45% had gone to work sick during the pandemic, with 58% of those doing so because they feared retaliation, such as being scheduled for fewer hours, or disciplinary consequences. A confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis or mandatory quarantine is required to access additional paid leave under Walmart’s emergency policy, which can be a significant obstacle given that many Associates do not have adequate health coverage.

I believe that improving the flow of information between frontline workers and Walmart’s board, which oversees the company’s management and has the power to set policy, would lead to more timely, consistent and effective action at the store level and would reduce reputational and financial risks to the company. Walmart’s founder, Sam Walton, exalted the value of Associate input: “The folks on the front lines—the ones who actually talk to the customer—are the only ones who really know what’s going on out there. You’d better find out what they know.” But even before COVID-19, Walmart failed to recognize the value of empowering Associates, with concerns raised about understaffing, the sick leave policy, and ineligibility for health benefits; the pandemic has shown the folly of that approach.

My proposal does not dictate how Walmart should select Associates for membership on the Council. I recommend, however, that Walmart use a mechanism by which Associates can select some or all of the members to ensure that the Council truly represents hourly Associate views.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Anima Sgr For
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USS For USS would support additional information on the Company's stakeholder engagement practices.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.