CHEVRON CORPORATION | Report on climate change financial risks at Chevron Corporation

Status
38.70% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
CVX
Lead filer
As You Sow
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Markets require information to operate and deploy capital effectively. In 2019 and 2020, global and U.S. accounting and auditing standard-setters reiterated that material climate-related risks should be accounted for in company financial statements and audits. Major investor groups, representing assets worth over $103 trillion, have also called on companies and auditors to fully reflect climate risks to companies’ financial results and position.

These concerns reflect a converging consensus by policymakers, investors, and companies on growing climate risk, the need to limit global temperature increase to 1.5° C (net zero global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050), and the impact of such actions to companies.

The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Net Zero Scenario describes an energy sector pathway to achieve net zero emissions. The Scenario finds that no new investment in fossil supply projects is needed, and anticipates oil prices dropping as low as $36/ barrel in 2030 and $24/ barrel in 2050.

Given these global climate imperatives, to best allocate investments, investors are calling for information to assess the financial impacts of climate-related physical and transition risks on companies and identify companies best positioned to thrive in a low carbon economy. Yet, more than 70% of listed companies, representing some of the world’s largest carbon-polluters, are not fully accounting for climate-related risks in their financial statements.

Chevron continues to develop new fossil fuel resources while acknowledging climate related risks that could lead to increased future impairments. Despite the materiality of this issue, Chevron’s audited annual disclosures do not currently provide investors with sufficient insight into assumptions used to assess productive assets for impairment and stranded asset risk. Further, an independent 2021 analysis concluded that Chevron’s financial statements lack the requisite transparency about climate-related assumptions and estimates, and that the company does not appear to use Paris-aligned assumptions and estimates.

In contrast, peers (Shell, bp, TotalEnergies) have released more transparent disclosures in their audited financial statements, articulating the extent of consideration of climate change contingencies and risks.

Accurate accounting assists investors in understanding the drivers of risk and return. Investors seek additional information from Chevron to understand the impact of climate-related factors on its business model and current financial reporting.
Whereas clause
Shareholders request Chevron’s Board of Directors provide an audited report addressing how application of the assumptions of the IEA’s Net Zero by 2050 pathway would affect the assumptions and estimates underlying its financial statements, including its long-term commodity and carbon prices, remaining asset lives, existing and future asset retirement obligations, capital expenditures, and asset valuations (impairments). The report should be produced at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information.
Supporting statement
Proponents recommend the report be supported with reasonable assurance from an independent auditor.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. For
Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Foundation For
KBI Global Investors For
LocalTapiola Asset Management Ltd For A vote FOR this proposal is warranted because shareholders would benefit from greater disclosure about the company’s risk of stranded assets, given its planned spending plan and business strategy.
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USS For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.