Monster Beverage Corp | Report on GHG reduction targets (net-zero) at Monster Beverage Corporation

Status
44.19% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
MNSTX
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
The increasing rate and number of climate related disasters affecting society is causing alarms to be raised globally, making the corporate sector’s contribution to climate mitigation a significant policy issue.

Beyond environmental and social harms, climate change is creating systemic risks to the economy. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission last year underscored that climate change could impair the productive capacity of the U.S. economy.

Shareholders are increasingly concerned about material climate risk to their companies and their portfolios and seek clear and consistent disclosures from the companies in which they invest, including credible climate transition plans. BlackRock’s CEO writes that, “there is no company whose business model won’t be profoundly affected by the transition to a net zero economy” and that investors “are asking companies to disclose a plan for how their business model will be compatible with a net zero economy.”

In response to material climate risk, the Climate Action 100+ initiative (CA100+), a coalition of 615 investors with $60 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Benchmark (Benchmark) outlining metrics that create climate accountability for companies and transparency for shareholders. Indicators 1 through 5 of the Benchmark seek reporting on companies’ net zero emissions ambitions; short, medium and long term greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions goals covering enterprise-wide emissions; and strategic action plans to achieve decarbonization targets.

Monster Beverage Corporation sells and distributes beverages and concentrates. Our company has adopted activities to reduce GHG emissions such as installing energy efficient lighting and control systems, undertaking manufacturing localization efforts, and use of electric vehicles. While our Company completed its first Scope 1 and 2 emissions reporting in 2020, it has not adopted GHG reduction goals. By setting targets, reporting a clear climate transition plan, and demonstrating progress toward achieving net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner, Monster Beverage Corporation can provide investors with assurance that management is reducing its climate contribution and addressing the growing risks associated with climate change.
Whereas clause
Shareholders request that Monster Beverage issue a report at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information disclosing how the Company intends to reduce its operational and supply chain GHG emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement's 1.5 degree goal requiring net zero emissions by 2050.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest, at Board and Company discretion, that the report include:
• Disclosure of the Company’s annual Scope 3 (where relevant) GHG emissions.
• A timeline for setting a net zero GHG reduction target and aligned interim goals.
• An enterprise-wide climate transition plan to achieve net zero emissions.
• A rationale for any decision not to set targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5 degree goal.
• Other information the Board deems appropriate.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. For
LocalTapiola Asset Management Ltd For A vote FOR this proposal is warranted, as additional information on the company's efforts to reduce its carbon footprint and align its operations with Paris Agreement goals would allow investors to better understand how the company is managing its transition to a low carbon economy and climate change related risks.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.