THE HOME DEPOT, INC. | Achieving Gender and Racial Equity on the Board of Directors
How other organisations have declared their voting intentions
Organisation name | Declared voting intentions | Rationale |
---|---|---|
EFG Asset Management | For | Home Depot reports that its Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates and recommends candidates for membership on the board. The board states that the committee nominates and selects candidates based on, among other things, the candidate s experience, skills, background, gender, race, and other qualities and attributes. Furthermore, the company states it is committed to having a diverse board, has a board nominating process that includes diverse candidates in candidates searches, and has a board that reflects this. However, further reporting on the company s steps to increase gender and racial board diversity could be of value to shareholders. A commitment to diversity at all levels of a company can assist companies in attracting employees, creating goodwill with consumers, and competing in an increasingly global marketplace, which in turn can benefit long-term shareholder value. Given its adoption would serve to promote the company's efforts to promote diversity and that the resolution does not appear to constrain the firm's ability to recruit competent and experienced executives and board members with suitable skill sets specific to the company's needs, this resolution warrants shareholder support. |
DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.
Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.
Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.