INTEL CORPORATION | Assessing Inclusion in the Workplace

Status
16.74% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
INTC
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board of Directors oversee an independent third-party audit analyzing whether written policies or unwritten norms at Intel reinforce racism in company culture, and report to shareholders on planned remedies the Board intends to take in response.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS:

“Structural racism is the overarching system of racial bias across institutions and society. These systems give privileges to white people resulting in disadvantages to people of color,” thereby imposing a cultural hierarchy among racial groups;

The Harvard Business Review explains that “[c]ompanies must confront racism at a systemic level – addressing everything from the structural and social mechanics of their own organizations to the role they place in the economy at large”;

A 2020 Citigroup study found that since 2000 the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) has lost $16 trillion as a result of discrimination against African Americans and that reversing discriminatory practices could boost U.S. GDP by $5 trillion in the next five years;

Tema Okun, a veteran racial justice facilitator, illustrates the insidious nature of white supremacist culture by explaining that “[c]ulture is powerful precisely because it is so present and at the same time so very difficult to name or identify.” Cultural racism can manifest as people of color being ignored, overly criticized, undermined, or assumed as inferior; strict cultural norms or criticisms of physical appearances or manners of speech. Cultural racism can cause long-term psychological damage;

While Intel’s CSR Report indicates that “over the past decade, we have taken actions to deeply integrate diversity and inclusion expectations into our culture…” the Proponent notes that only 5% of the company’s U.S. workforce is African American and 10.5% are Hispanic/Latinx, despite making up over 12% and 18% of the country’s population, respectively;

Concerningly, “underrepresented minorities” (URMs) are further underrepresented in senior leadership. While URMs make up 16% of the company workforce, only 7.6% of leadership roles are held by employees in these groups;

While the company has set goals related to representation in senior leadership, it has not reported if or how it intends to address corporate culture issues that may be the root problem. Proponents believe that long-term value creation could be advanced through an analysis of whether and how systemic racism is embedded in company culture, policies, and procedures.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: The report should be prepared within one year, at reasonable cost and excluding proprietary and privileged information. The report is encouraged to assess whether Intel policies or unwritten norms:

1. Yield inequitable outcomes for employees based on race and ethnicity in patterns of hiring and retention, promotion, and upward mobility; disciplinary action; determining factors for allocation of “stretch assignments”; formal or informal sponsorship and mentorship; and employee usage of benefits, aggregated by company role and/or business unit;

2. Establish a cultural hierarchy through perceived pressure to code-switch in appearance, demeanor, word choice, or other suppressions of cultural identity.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.