TJX COMPANIES, INC. | Assessing Due Diligence on Human Rights in Supply Chain

24.64% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
Resolution details
Company ticker
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Modern slavery inc. forced labour
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders of TJX Companies urge the Board of Directors to oversee a third-party assessment and report to shareholders, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, assessing the effectiveness of current company due diligence in preventing forced, child, and prison labor in TJX’s supply chain.
Whereas clause

TJX Companies sources from approximately 21,000 vendors in over 100 countries. While TJX’s Vendor Code of Conduct prohibits forced, child, and prison labor, TJX does not conduct or require routine audits of factories to confirm compliance, beyond the producers of private label merchandise (reportedly a very small portion of merchandise);

TJX's failure to disclose adequate due diligence mechanisms has caused a low score on
human rights benchmarking. The preeminent UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) specify due diligence principles for human rights commitments, including assessing actual and potential human rights impacts, integrating and acting upon findings, tracking responses, and communicating remedies;

The World Benchmarking Alliance’s 2020 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark evaluated companies against the UNGP. TJX was one of the poorest scoring apparel companies evaluated – of 26 possible points, TJX scored 4, including zero on each Human Rights Due Diligence indicator;

Ample evidence of severe human rights violation risk exists in TJX supply chains:
• In numerous countries from which TJX sources, the Department of Labor has found evidence of forced or child labor in manufacture of footwear, garments, textiles, toys, jewelry, and leather;

• The Coalition to End Forced Labour in the Uyghur Region reports that “virtually the entire apparel and footwear industry is tainted by forced Uyghur and Turkic Muslim Labour” and that TJX has not yet taken “all credible steps” to prevent forced labor of Uyghurs in its supply chain;

• U.S. garment manufacturers employ millions of undocumented workers which are “unquestionably more vulnerable to labor exploitation.” The industry’s “multiple levels of contracting, intense industry competition, and dysfunctional immigration policies impede efforts to establish and sustain a legal, safe, and fair working environment” ;

Also in the U.S., half the incarcerated population works in some way. Research indicates that over 60,000 incarcerated people work in correctional industries annually – an industry worth $1 billion. Most are paid subminimum wages; some are coerced or forced to work in inhumane conditions. Some incarcerated workers are also known to produce merchandise sold at U.S. retailers.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Shareholders recommend that the report, at Board and management's discretion:

• Assess risks that TJX’s existing approach, lacking systematic verification of compliance with the Vendor Code of Conduct, could lead to occurrences of forced, child, or prison labor in the supply chain;
• Evaluate related risks to company finances, operations, and reputation;
• Examine whether requiring third-party environmental and social audits of vendors would reduce such risks, and any rationale for not requiring such audits;
• Draw upon guidance of international standards such as the UNGP and the ILO Indicators of Forced Labor.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Foundation For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.