UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | Net Zero Climate Transition Plan

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
UNH
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
The increasing rate and number of climate related disasters is raising alarms globally, making the corporate sector’s contribution to climate mitigation a significant policy issue.

Beyond environmental and social harms, climate change is creating systemic economic risks. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission last year underscored that climate change could impair the productive capacity of the U.S. economy.

Shareholders increasingly concerned about material climate risk to their companies and their portfolios are seeking clear and consistent disclosures, including credible climate transition plans. In response to material climate risk, the Climate Action 100+ initiative (CA100+), a coalition of 615 investors with $60 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Benchmark outlining metrics that create climate accountability for companies and transparency for shareholders. Indicators 1 through 5 of the Benchmark seek reporting on companies’ net zero emissions ambitions; short, medium and long term greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions goals aligned with 1.5 degrees; and strategic action plans to achieve decarbonization targets.

UnitedHealth Group Inc. is a diversified healthcare company. Our company has undertaken limited emission reduction activities, such as some energy efficiency projects and the purchase of some renewable energy credits. While our company has established a goal to achieve a 3% reduction of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2023 from a 2017 baseline, this goal is not adequate to reduce emissions in line with 1.5 degrees, which would require more than 8 times our company’s existing target. Furthermore, our company’s current reduction goal covers only 55 percent of its operational emissions. UnitedHealth also fails to establish Scope 3 reduction targets.

Our company has established a goal to achieve net zero emissions by 2035, but this commitment appears to rely primarily on carbon offsets rather than direct mitigation. Science-based targets and the CA100+ Benchmark seek direct emissions reductions, with no more than 10% achieved through use of offsets.

By setting 1.5 degree aligned targets, reporting an effective climate transition plan, and demonstrating progress toward achieving 1.5 degree aligned GHG reductions, UnitedHealth Group can provide investors with assurance that management is appropriately reducing its climate contribution and addressing growing climate-related risks.
Whereas clause
Shareholders request UnitedHealth Group issue a report at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information disclosing how the Company intends to reduce its operational and supply chain GHG emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement's 1.5 degree goal.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest, at Board and Company discretion, that the report include:
• A timeline for setting Scopes 1-3 GHG reduction targets aligned with 1.5 degrees;
• An enterprise-wide climate transition plan to achieve GHG reductions aligned with 1.5 degrees;
• A rationale for any decision not to align emission reductions with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5 degree goal.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.